
Context Engineering And Model Context Protocols (MCP) Usage
The explosive growth in the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transitioned AI from a purely experimental field into the core engine of enterprise innovation. However, raw LLMs, while intelligent, are often prone to factual errors (hallucinations) and are inherently limited to the data they were trained on, lacking real-time awareness and the ability to interact with the world.
This deficiency has given rise to two interconnected, critical disciplines that are defining the next generation of AI applications: Context Engineering and the standardization of external connectivity through Model Context Protocols (MCP). Together, they represent a shift from merely crafting clever prompts (prompt engineering) to designing entire, intelligent ecosystems where the AI operates with awareness, precision, and the ability to execute real-world actions.
🔬 Part I: Context Engineering—The Science of Strategic Input
Context Engineering is the strategic design and management of the entire information environment provided to a Large Language Model (LLM) or AI system to guide its comprehension, reasoning, and real-world behavior. It treats the LLM not as a static entity, but as a component within a dynamic system, where the quality and structure of the input context determine the quality and reliability of the output.
Think of it as briefing a highly intelligent, amnesiac colleague before every single task. You must provide not just the immediate instruction, but the entire background, necessary tools, and institutional knowledge for them to succeed.
1. Context Engineering vs. Prompt Engineering
The distinction between the two disciplines is fundamental:
| Feature | Prompt Engineering | Context Engineering |
| Focus | Crafting a single, effective, self-contained instruction or question. | Architecting the entire input environment across multiple interactions and sessions. |
| Scope | Single turn or short conversational exchange. | Full application lifecycle, memory management, and tool orchestration. |
| Objective | Getting a good, one-off answer. | Ensuring long-term reliability, consistency, personalization, and governance. |
| Model View | The model is a black box responding to text input. | The model is an intelligent agent operating within a data and tool ecosystem. |
2. Core Components of the Context Framework
Effective context engineering relies on systematically managing multiple, layered data streams that flow into the LLM's context window (the limited buffer of input tokens the model can process at once).
A. System and User Roles
The System Prompt defines the AI's persona, operational boundaries, tone, and scope of responsibility (e.g., "You are a legal assistant specializing in corporate compliance," or "Only answer questions using verified data from the knowledge base"). This is the foundational layer of context.
B. Memory Management
To maintain continuity across interactions, systems must manage memory:
-
Short-Term Memory: The immediate conversation history within the context window. Context engineering uses techniques like summarization and hierarchical context building to condense lengthy exchanges into key points, preventing context window overload.
-
Long-Term Memory: Persistent data about the user, their preferences, past actions, and learned patterns, typically stored externally (e.g., in vector databases) and retrieved when relevant.
C. Knowledge Grounding (RAG)
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a cornerstone of context engineering. It addresses the LLM's lack of real-time knowledge and tendency to hallucinate.
-
Retrieval: When a query is made, the system searches an external knowledge base (corporate documents, real-time data) for relevant text chunks.
-
Augmentation: These relevant, factual chunks are prepended or appended to the user's query and fed into the LLM's context window.
-
Generation: The LLM generates its response, grounded in the provided external facts, drastically improving accuracy and verifiability. This process makes the AI context-aware of proprietary, up-to-date information.
D. Context-Aware Tool Integration
For AI to move beyond conversation and perform actions (e.g., check inventory, send an email, update a CRM record), it needs tools. Context engineering involves:
-
Tool Description: Providing precise, clear descriptions of available functions and their inputs/outputs within the context window.
-
Dynamic Selection: The LLM uses its reasoning to determine which tool is necessary to fulfill a request and generates a structured function call output.
-
Input/Output Handling: Structuring the tool's output so the LLM can seamlessly re-ingest it as new context to inform the final, human-readable response.
3. Advanced Context Strategies
The discipline is continually evolving to handle increasingly complex, multi-step tasks:
-
Context Hierarchy Design: Prioritizing and ordering context elements by relevance (Primary: immediate task; Secondary: supporting details; Tertiary: background information) to leverage the model's attention mechanisms efficiently.
-
Context Compression: Using models to summarize or filter out irrelevant "noise" from long documents or chat histories before they consume valuable tokens in the primary LLM's context window.
-
Multi-Modal Context: Extending the context beyond text to include structured data (JSON, tables), temporal data (schedules), and visual context (images or diagrams), enabling the model to reason across different data types.
-
Progressive Context Building: Starting with minimal, essential context and adding layers of detail only as the conversation or task necessitates it, optimizing both latency and cost.
🔗 Part II: Model Context Protocol (MCP)—The Standardization Layer
While Context Engineering defines what context the LLM needs, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) defines how that context is securely, efficiently, and universally exchanged between the LLM and the external world.
The Model Context Protocol is an open standard (introduced by Anthropic in November 2024 and rapidly adopted by major players like OpenAI and Google DeepMind) that standardizes the integration between AI systems and external tools, applications, and data sources.
1. The Problem MCP Solves
Before MCP, connecting an LLM to a new data source (like a corporate database or a proprietary ERP system) required building a custom integration layer specific to that model and that application. This resulted in an "N x M" integration problem: the number of required custom connectors grew quadratically with every new model ($N$) and every new tool ($M$), creating a fragmented, costly, and cumbersome AI ecosystem.
MCP solves this by acting as a universal interface, often analogized to a USB-C port for AI applications.
2. The MCP Architecture
MCP defines a standardized, two-way communication framework:
| Component | Description | Function |
| MCP Host | The AI application or environment (e.g., an AI-powered IDE, a customer support bot) that contains the LLM. | User interaction point and central manager for the AI workflow. |
| MCP Client | The component within the Host that translates the LLM's requests into the standardized MCP format and finds available servers. | Translates LLM output (the structured function call) into a network request. |
| MCP Server | An external service, application, or tool that exposes its functionality via the standardized MCP specification. | Exposes specialized functions (e.g., "get_latest_sales_report") and handles the connection to the proprietary system (e.g., Salesforce, GitHub, PostgreSQL). |
| MCP Protocol | The formal specification (often transported over JSON-RPC 2.0) that dictates the structure of requests and responses. | Ensures seamless interoperability regardless of the LLM or tool vendor. |
3. The Power of MCP in Context Engineering
MCP is the ultimate enabler of advanced context engineering:
-
Standardized Tool Use: MCP ensures that the LLM's generated function call is always understood by the external system. This makes tool integration reliable and reusable across different LLM providers.
-
Real-World Agency: By connecting to hundreds of thousands of enterprise functions via MCP Servers (e.g., Microsoft Dynamics 365, GitHub, Google Drive), the LLM can move beyond mere text generation to become a fully capable, autonomous AI Agent that can perform complex business actions.
-
Security and Governance: MCP facilitates secure, governed access to sensitive data. The protocol design allows the data to remain within the organization's infrastructure (where the MCP Server resides), while the LLM receives only the necessary, filtered context. This simplifies auditing and adherence to compliance rules (like GDPR or HIPAA).
-
Ecosystem Expansion: MCP accelerates the creation of specialized, third-party tools (MCP Servers) that developers can easily plug into any MCP-compliant AI application, rapidly expanding the capabilities of AI assistants.
📈 Part III: The Synergy of Context Engineering and MCP
The future of advanced AI applications lies in the tight synergy between these two fields. Context Engineering provides the intelligence (the reasoning and planning), and MCP provides the real-world connections (the standardized tools and data pipelines).
1. Enabling Autonomous AI Agents
Agentic AI—systems that can break down complex tasks, self-correct, and use tools to achieve a high-level goal—is the primary beneficiary.
In a multi-agent system, Context Engineering is used to:
-
Define the roles and specialized knowledge (context) for each sub-agent (e.g., "Planner Agent," "Coder Agent," "Reviewer Agent").
-
Manage the workflow context and memory across the agents, ensuring smooth handoffs.
MCP is used to:
-
Connect the Coder Agent to an MCP Server for GitHub to fetch code and commit changes.
-
Connect the Reviewer Agent to an MCP Server for Jira/Slack to update tickets and notify the team.
This combination allows AI to execute end-to-end business processes that are currently too complex for traditional automation.
2. The Shift to Context Governance
As AI systems gain more autonomy and access to sensitive data, Context Governance becomes a critical enterprise capability. This involves:
-
Context Validation: Automating checks to verify that the retrieved RAG context is accurate and not conflicting with business rules.
-
Auditability: Establishing clear logs of every piece of context used to generate a response or execute an action, which is essential for regulated industries.
-
Permission Layering: Integrating the user's security permissions directly into the MCP Server's logic, ensuring the LLM can only access data and functions the human user is authorized to see or perform. The evolution of protocols like the Dynamics 365 ERP MCP server to become dynamic is directly aimed at this security requirement.
🔮 Conclusion: Mastering the AI Environment
The age of simple, isolated prompts is over. The rise of Context Engineering and the rapid adoption of the Model Context Protocol signify a fundamental maturation in the AI industry.
Context Engineering professionalizes the process of ensuring an LLM has the necessary knowledge, memory, and behavioral guidelines to perform reliably in complex, real-world enterprise settings. MCP, in turn, provides the standardized infrastructure to connect that sophisticated intelligence to the vast, distributed landscape of enterprise data and services.
Mastering these two disciplines is no longer optional; it is the definitive path to building high-fidelity, production-ready AI applications that deliver verifiable business value, reduced hallucination rates, and enhanced user experiences. The future success of generative AI hinges on engineering not just better models, but the optimal environment in which they operate.
