Syria's Shifting Sands: Arab States Vie With Turkey For Influence
**
The Syrian conflict, a decade-long maelstrom of violence and displacement, is entering a new, albeit uncertain, phase. While the Assad regime, backed by Russia and Iran, has consolidated its control over much of the country, a complex power struggle is underway to shape the future of Syria. This struggle pits Turkey, a significant regional player with military presence in northern Syria, against a coalition of Arab states seeking to regain influence in a country long destabilized by war. This competition highlights the deep-seated geopolitical rivalries in the region and underscores the challenges in rebuilding a shattered nation.
The core of the current dynamic lies in the apparent willingness of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and other Arab nations to engage with the Assad regime, despite its well-documented human rights abuses and its reliance on Iranian and Russian support. This strategic shift represents a significant departure from the previous decade, where these same Arab states actively supported the Syrian opposition in its fight against Assad. The reason for this change is multifaceted, primarily driven by a desire to counter growing Iranian influence in Syria and the broader region.
By overlooking the Assad regime’s brutal past and its ties to extremist groups, these Arab nations hope to establish a strong foothold in Syria, securing economic and political advantages before Turkey further consolidates its position. Turkey, having established a series of military outposts and proxy forces within Syria's northern territories, is primarily focused on containing Kurdish groups and managing the flow of refugees. This differs from the Arab states' approach, which emphasizes re-establishing diplomatic relations and potentially investing in Syria’s reconstruction.
This calculated risk by the Arab states carries substantial implications. The normalization of relations with Assad risks undermining international efforts to hold the Syrian regime accountable for its war crimes and human rights violations. Dr. Emile Hokayem, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), explains: "The Arab states' approach is a pragmatic gamble, driven by a desire to curb Iranian influence and gain economic leverage. However, it comes at the cost of neglecting the ethical dimensions of Assad's regime, potentially emboldening authoritarianism in the region."
The economic dimension of this power struggle is equally crucial. Syria's pre-war economy was considerably robust, and its reconstruction represents a lucrative opportunity for both Arab investors and Turkish businesses. Competition for access to Syria’s resources, infrastructure projects, and potentially lucrative contracts is driving the intensified rivalry. This economic competition could exacerbate existing political tensions, leading to proxy conflicts and further instability.
Furthermore, the reintegration of Syrian refugees into their homeland is a significant factor influencing the geopolitical dynamics. Turkey, hosting millions of Syrian refugees, is eager to facilitate their return under controlled conditions. The Arab states, however, have a less clear strategy regarding refugee repatriation, and their involvement could influence the process significantly. The potential for disputes over refugee resettlement creates another layer of complexity in the already fraught landscape.
The competition between Turkey and the Arab states is also complicated by the enduring presence of non-state actors, including various rebel factions and extremist groups. These groups, some affiliated with Al-Qaeda or ISIS, continue to operate in pockets of Syria, posing a significant security challenge. This complicates the efforts of both Turkey and the Arab states to achieve their respective objectives and risks prolonging instability. As Dr. Jennifer Cafarella, a leading expert on Syria at the Institute for the Study of War, observes: "The enduring presence of non-state actors poses a major obstacle to achieving any lasting peace or stability in Syria. Their influence must be carefully considered in any strategic calculus regarding the country's future."
The ongoing power struggle in Syria underscores the multifaceted and deeply complex nature of the conflict’s aftermath. The decision by Arab states to engage with Assad, while pragmatic from a geopolitical perspective, raises significant ethical concerns and could have unintended consequences, including a further erosion of international norms and standards for human rights. The next chapter in Syria's history will be shaped by the interplay of these competing interests and the unpredictable actions of non-state actors. The current dynamics highlight the fragility of peace and the enduring need for a comprehensive, internationally-backed strategy to address the multifaceted challenges facing Syria. The race for influence in post-conflict Syria is far from over, and its outcome will have lasting ramifications for the region and beyond.
**
